New Son for Uyghur Woman
2009-02-13
A Uyghur woman in China whose pregnancy drew international attention has given birth to a son.
HONG KONG—An ethnic Uyghur woman in China’s northwestern Xinjiang region who avoided a forced abortion after her case drew international attention has given birth to a son, according to her father.
Hasan Tursunjan said his daughter, Arzigul Tursun, gave birth Feb. 9 to a healthy son weighing three kg at Dadamtu Village Hospital in Gulja [in Chinese, Yining].
But Tursunjan said the child was taken shortly after delivery to the Women and Children’s Welfare Hospital in Ili prefecture, the same hospital where Arzigul was held when scheduled by family planning officials for a forced abortion in November.
"The second day after the baby was born, the prefectural hospital took our child and only returned him after three days," Tursunjan said.
"The prefectural hospital ordered the village hospital to bring the child. They said he didn't have enough sustenance because Arzigul’s stomach was empty when she gave birth," he said.
"When I heard this, I got into an argument with my son-in-law. 'Why should you give your child to the prefectural hospital?’ I asked him. Now I’m not sure if this was some kind of trick or not. Why would the hospital take him, especially without either of the parents along?" he said.
Police intervention
Tursunjan said local police have kept the family under surveillance, even forbidding them from naming the child according to their wishes.
"Originally we tried to name him Koresh [struggle], but the village police bureau told my son-in-law that he could not name him that. That’s why we named him Umid [hope]," he said.
Police have been wary of the family since Tursun’s planned abortion, scheduled because her pregnancy was in violation of China's aggressive population-control policy, prompted intervention from two members of the U.S. Congress and the U.S. ambassador in Beijing, he said.
Police tracked down Arzigul Tursun, six months pregnant with her third child, in November at a private home after she fled Gulja's municipal Water Gate Hospital.
She had been held there by family planning authorities who planned to force her to abort the child. She was released after her case drew international attention.
China's one-child-per-family policy applies mainly to majority Han Chinese and allows ethnic minorities, including Uyghurs, to have additional children.
Detailed policy
According to China’s official Xinhua news agency, Uyghurs in the countryside are permitted three children while city-dwellers may have two.
Under “special circumstances,” rural families are permitted one more child, although what constitutes special circumstances was unclear.
And while Tursun is a rural peasant, her husband is from the city of Gulja, so their status is ambiguous.
The government also uses financial incentives and disincentives to keep the birthrate low.
Couples can pay steep fines to have more children, though the fines are beyond most people's means.
The official Web site China Xinjiang Web reports that in Kashgar, Hotan, and Kizilsu—areas populated almost entirely by Uyghurs—women over 49 with only one child are entitled to a one-time payment of 3,000 yuan (U.S. $440), with the couple receiving 600 yuan (U.S. $88) yearly afterward.
China's official Tianshan Net reported that population control policies in Xinjiang have prevented the births of some 3.7 million people over the last 30 years.
The one-child policy is enforced more strictly in cities, but penalties for exceeding a family's quota can be severe, including job loss, demotion, or expulsion from the Party, experts say.
Officials at all levels are subject to rewards or penalties based on whether they meet population targets set by their administrative region.
Citizens are legally entitled to sue officials who they believe have overstepped their authority in enforcing the policy.
Tense relations
Relations between Chinese authorities and the predominantly Muslim Uyghur population in Xinjiang have a long and tense history, with many Uyghurs objecting in particular to the mass immigration of Han Chinese to the region and to Beijing’s population-control policy.
Uyghurs formed two short-lived East Turkestan republics in the 1930s and 40s during the Chinese civil war and the Japanese invasion.
But China subsequently took control of the region, and Beijing has in recent years launched a campaign against Uyghur separatism, which it calls a war on Islamic terrorism.
Beijing has also accused “hostile forces” in the West of fomenting unrest in the strategically important and resource-rich region, which borders several countries in Central Asia.
Original reporting in Uyghur by Shohret Hoshur. Uyghur service director: Dolkun Kamberi. Translated by Dolkun Kamberi. Written and produced in English by Joshua Lipes. Edited by Sarah Jackson-Han.
Benbe:http://www.rfa.org/english/news/uyghur/uyghurbirth-02132009165136.html
Saturday, February 14, 2009
Monday, February 9, 2009
Frankfurt Sheheride „5-Féwral Ghulja Weqesi“ Xatirlinip Namayish Élip Bérildi
Sherqitürkistan Birliki Teshkilati mushu ayning 7-küni, „Ghulja 5-Féwral weqesi“,ni xatirlesh munasiwéti bilen, yérim esirdin artuq waqittin béri milliy kimliki we milliy téritoriyesi ret qilinip, insaniyet tarixida körülüp baqmighan shekilde érqiy we kultural qirghinchiliqqa uchrawatqan, Sherqitürkistan xelqining erkinlikke, hörlükke, démokoratiyege we milliy musteqilliqqa bolghan ottek intilishini ipadilep teshwiqat paaliyiti élip bardi.
Sherqiturkistan xelqi buningdin 12 yil awal yeni 1997-yili 5-Féwralda wetinimiz sherqitürkistanning Ghulja Sheheride, Xitayning wetinimizde yürgüziwatqan milliy zulumigha qarshi qozghulup, qanliq basturulghanidi. Teshkilatimiz 5-Féwral weqesi munasiwiti bilen weten-milletning bizdin kütken ümüdini aqlash, Xitay hakimiyitidin kéliwatqan milliy xorluqqa qarshi jasaritimizni ipadilesh, shu herikette qurban bolghan shéhidlarni yad étish, xatirlesh we Xitayning wehshiylikini erkin dunyagha anglitish üchün, Frankfurt Sheheride paaliyet élip bardi.
Sherqitürkistanda Ikkinchi Jumhuriyitimiz qurulghan Ghulja Sheheride yüz bergen „5-Féwral weqesi“, weten-millet üchün barliqini atighan Abduxélil Abdumijit, Édrisxan Mexsum qatarliq minglighan ezimetlirimizning issiq qanliri bilen milliy küresh tariximizda parlap turidighan yéngi sehipilerni achqanidi.
Uningdin bashqa bu weqe sewebidin, Uyghur millitining siyasiy teqdiri xelqara sehnilerde hazirghiche bes-munazire qozghap, milliy azatliq kürishimizge daghdam yol échildi.
„5-Féwral Ghulja weqesi“ ikkinchi Jumhuriyitimiz Xitay tajawuzchilliri teripidin munqeriz qilinghandin kéyin yüz bergen, qarshiliq körsütüsh herketliri ichidiki wekil xaraktérgha ige weqelerning biri bolup, hazirghiche pütün dunya miqyasida tillarda dastan bolup kelmekte.U heriket On ikki yildin kéyinmu Milliy zulumgha qarshi Insanlarning, jümlidin Sherqitürkistan xelqining qelbide qehrimanliq we baturluqning namayendisi süpitide medihiyilinip kelmekte.
Teshkilat ezaliri 10 minglighan kishining „5-Fewral Ghulja weqesi“ sewebididin Xitay pashist hakimiyitining her türlük jazalirigha uchrighanliqi, türmilerge tashlinip ölüm jazasigha buyrulghanliqi, ömürlük siyasiy hoquqidin mehrum qilinghanliqi, Ailisi xaniweyran qilinghanliqi, dada balidin, perzentler ailidin ayrilip, yurt-makanlirini tashlap dunyaning her tereplirige topidek sorulup ketkenlikini Gérman xelqige anglatti. Xitaylarning bu weqe munasiwiti bilen millitimizning béshigha keltürgen balayi apetler, xelqimizning qelbide untup ketkili bolmaydighan öchmenliklerni we saqaytqili bolmaydighan yarilarni peyda qilghanliqini teshwiq qilidighan bérishur we teshwiqat matériyallirini tarqatti.
Bu paaliyet bir qisim teshkilat ezalirimizning qatnishishi bilen Saet 12:00 de bashlinip 15:00 giche dawamlashti. Bashtin axir qizghin we keskin bir shekilde élip bérilip ghelbilik axirlashti.
Sherqitürkistan Birliki Teshkilati Teshwiqat Merkizi
07.02.2009 Frankfurt
Sherqitürkistan Birliki Teshkilati mushu ayning 7-küni, „Ghulja 5-Féwral weqesi“,ni xatirlesh munasiwéti bilen, yérim esirdin artuq waqittin béri milliy kimliki we milliy téritoriyesi ret qilinip, insaniyet tarixida körülüp baqmighan shekilde érqiy we kultural qirghinchiliqqa uchrawatqan, Sherqitürkistan xelqining erkinlikke, hörlükke, démokoratiyege we milliy musteqilliqqa bolghan ottek intilishini ipadilep teshwiqat paaliyiti élip bardi.
Sherqiturkistan xelqi buningdin 12 yil awal yeni 1997-yili 5-Féwralda wetinimiz sherqitürkistanning Ghulja Sheheride, Xitayning wetinimizde yürgüziwatqan milliy zulumigha qarshi qozghulup, qanliq basturulghanidi. Teshkilatimiz 5-Féwral weqesi munasiwiti bilen weten-milletning bizdin kütken ümüdini aqlash, Xitay hakimiyitidin kéliwatqan milliy xorluqqa qarshi jasaritimizni ipadilesh, shu herikette qurban bolghan shéhidlarni yad étish, xatirlesh we Xitayning wehshiylikini erkin dunyagha anglitish üchün, Frankfurt Sheheride paaliyet élip bardi.
Sherqitürkistanda Ikkinchi Jumhuriyitimiz qurulghan Ghulja Sheheride yüz bergen „5-Féwral weqesi“, weten-millet üchün barliqini atighan Abduxélil Abdumijit, Édrisxan Mexsum qatarliq minglighan ezimetlirimizning issiq qanliri bilen milliy küresh tariximizda parlap turidighan yéngi sehipilerni achqanidi.
Uningdin bashqa bu weqe sewebidin, Uyghur millitining siyasiy teqdiri xelqara sehnilerde hazirghiche bes-munazire qozghap, milliy azatliq kürishimizge daghdam yol échildi.
„5-Féwral Ghulja weqesi“ ikkinchi Jumhuriyitimiz Xitay tajawuzchilliri teripidin munqeriz qilinghandin kéyin yüz bergen, qarshiliq körsütüsh herketliri ichidiki wekil xaraktérgha ige weqelerning biri bolup, hazirghiche pütün dunya miqyasida tillarda dastan bolup kelmekte.U heriket On ikki yildin kéyinmu Milliy zulumgha qarshi Insanlarning, jümlidin Sherqitürkistan xelqining qelbide qehrimanliq we baturluqning namayendisi süpitide medihiyilinip kelmekte.
Teshkilat ezaliri 10 minglighan kishining „5-Fewral Ghulja weqesi“ sewebididin Xitay pashist hakimiyitining her türlük jazalirigha uchrighanliqi, türmilerge tashlinip ölüm jazasigha buyrulghanliqi, ömürlük siyasiy hoquqidin mehrum qilinghanliqi, Ailisi xaniweyran qilinghanliqi, dada balidin, perzentler ailidin ayrilip, yurt-makanlirini tashlap dunyaning her tereplirige topidek sorulup ketkenlikini Gérman xelqige anglatti. Xitaylarning bu weqe munasiwiti bilen millitimizning béshigha keltürgen balayi apetler, xelqimizning qelbide untup ketkili bolmaydighan öchmenliklerni we saqaytqili bolmaydighan yarilarni peyda qilghanliqini teshwiq qilidighan bérishur we teshwiqat matériyallirini tarqatti.
Bu paaliyet bir qisim teshkilat ezalirimizning qatnishishi bilen Saet 12:00 de bashlinip 15:00 giche dawamlashti. Bashtin axir qizghin we keskin bir shekilde élip bérilip ghelbilik axirlashti.
Sherqitürkistan Birliki Teshkilati Teshwiqat Merkizi
07.02.2009 Frankfurt
Wednesday, February 4, 2009
Uyghur Farmers Appeal, To No Avail
2009-01-30
A Uyghur farmer talks about his struggle against forced crop production in China’s northwestern Xinjiang Autonomous Region.
A farmer from China’s impoverished northwestern Xinjiang region was turned away by authorities in Beijing after he went there demanding compensation for a failed compulsory crop plan.
Hakim Siyit, a farmer from Yengisar county, in Xinjiang’s western Kashgar prefecture, blamed the secretary of the communist party's county branch for the plan’s failure, which called for all farmers in the county to grow the same crop and did not anticipate oversupply.
According to China’s law on the Popularization of Agricultural Technology, any entity causing loss to farmers through the forced adoption of technology is required to repay total damages.
Siyit made his way to China’s State Council in Beijing last September to lobby on behalf of his fellow farmers. When he arrived, hundreds of other petitioners waiting to file their grievances were registering with the Council according to their home region.
In an attempt to draw Beijing's attention, Siyit shot a long video of the farmers telling their tale. A brief excerpt.
"There were eleven people from Xinjiang out of nearly 700 people in total. I was the only Uyghur there. I did not know what to do. I only speak a little Chinese. I was worried that they might take me somewhere and no one would know about it,” Siyit, a member of the mostly Muslim Uyghur ethnic group, said.
“A Chinese man came and asked why I was there. I tried to explain what had happened in our county, but the man said he could not understand what I was saying and took me to the Public Affairs Office of Xinjiang in Beijing so that he could talk to me through a Uyghur translator…After taking me there, they locked me up in a hotel room," he said.
Siyit said that he was not allowed to leave the hotel and was refused an explanation as to why he was being held.
Promised an investigation
Later, two Uyghurs from the Kashgar Public Affairs Office took him with them and installed him in a guard’s room with another man.
“They told me not to leave. I said ‘We are not animals and we have the right to file complaints and report problems.’ I told them that they could not just detain me, as I had come all the way [from Xinjiang] on behalf of my people,” Siyit said.
Eventually, police officers from Yengisar county came to take Siyit home.
“I took my bag and tried to escape, but they dragged me back and told me to return with them. They said that I had spent so much [money] to go to Beijing, and promised me that the prefecture-level government would investigate the problem,” he said.
Siyit told the police officers that he had spent nearly 2,000 Yuan (U.S. $290) during his 23 day journey to Beijing. He was told that all of his expenses would be paid if he would agree to return.
“They gave me 100 Yuan (U.S. $15) before I took the train. I asked them about the rest and they said it would be handled when we returned. But that never happened. That was the end of it," Siyit said.
‘They will weep’
Siyit claims that a compulsory “long bean” production plan was put into effect in 2007 for Yengisar county in Xinjiang’s western Kashgar prefecture, resulting in heavy financial losses for farmers when harvest supply grossly overshot demand.
Later that year the plan was repeated with similar results. In all, Siyit says, the farmers of Yengisar county suffered nearly $50 million Yuan (U.S. $7.3 million) in lost profit, loans that they could not repay, and equipment they could no longer use.
“You can dial any random number [in Yengisar] and ask about long beans…they will weep if you ask them about it,” Siyit said.
Siyit said that the 12 villages in Yengisar county have a combined population of 240,000 and that Yin should have expected that forcing everyone to grow the same crop would lead to oversupply.
“Being the secretary, he should have known that the supply would be much higher than the demand, and there would a lot of waste,” he said.
“If only the secretary had organized it so that one village would grow long beans, another would grow tomatoes, another peppers, and another eggplants…" he said.
Asked whether Li or the party branch of Kashgar prefecture was ultimately responsible for the failed crop policy, Siyit replied "Is it not true that what children do depends on the parents?"
Several attempts
Siyit said that he and several other farmers have been trying for over two years to file a complaint about the planning policies of Yin Xiaoliang, secretary of the communist party's Yengisar County Branch.
In those two years, he was detained by county authorities for 15 days in Yengisar and, after vowing to continue his fight, has since been bounced around to several departments at the county, prefectural, regional, and national level.
“There are few places left that I haven't been to for this. I went to the Xinjiang regional government in Urumqi five times. I went to Beijing once. To Kashgar, I made 13 or 14 trips in total,” Siyit said.
Siyit created a film documenting the reaction of the farmers to news that they would be forced to plant long beans again not long after the failure of the first crop plan, but officials weren’t interested.
"Over the last year and half, no one at the meetings of the disciplinary inspection committees was interested at looking at the video. Not even at the autonomous region’s government level. I literally had to thrust the video into their hands for them to take it," Siyit said.
“They did not investigate, only saying that such things happen. Around the time of Eid [the holiday marking the end of Muslim Ramadan] the police came and warned me, telling me to be quiet or I might become a victim,” he said.
“Even here, in our county, the traffic police detained me three or four times…I escaped towards Urumqi and that is the situation now.”
Official reaction
A government official with the Disciplinary Inspection Committee of Kashgar prefecture, who did not provide his name, said he was aware of the farmers’ petition.
“Originally we considered going to Yengisar country together with an agricultural business management group to investigate the case, but when we asked permission [from deputy secretary of the prefecture’s party committee Zhang Jian], he stopped us. We were told ‘You shouldn’t go, let the county leader investigate first,’” the official said.
When asked if it was correct procedure to have the county’s party secretary investigate a complaint brought against him, the official replied “I know it doesn’t sound right, but perhaps the prefectural officials have their own considerations…To manage a whole county is not that easy.”
“Of course [the prefectural officials] will protect him. The county and prefecture should have same viewpoint and the county will carry out the prefecture’s order. If the higher-level officials don’t protect the lower-level officials, how would they expect them to follow orders later on?” the official said.
No regrets
Siyit said that he plans to continue his fight, despite the hardships he has faced, so that he can bring justice to the farmers of Yengisar county.
“I have no regrets for what I have done. When I was at the police station, I told them that I would continue to seek compensation for the 50 million yuan loss as soon as I was free,” Siyit said.
“I just wanted to go [to Beijing] for the benefit of people, hoping to get a good answer. The fact that I did not know Chinese cost me a lot…It was as if I could not speak and I could only weep for my complaints,” he said.
Original reporting in Uyghur by Shohrat. Uyghur service director: Dolkun Kamberi. Written for the Web in English by Joshua Lipes.
Menbe:http://www.rfa.org/english/news/uyghur/longbean-farmer-01302009234055.html
2009-01-30
A Uyghur farmer talks about his struggle against forced crop production in China’s northwestern Xinjiang Autonomous Region.
A farmer from China’s impoverished northwestern Xinjiang region was turned away by authorities in Beijing after he went there demanding compensation for a failed compulsory crop plan.
Hakim Siyit, a farmer from Yengisar county, in Xinjiang’s western Kashgar prefecture, blamed the secretary of the communist party's county branch for the plan’s failure, which called for all farmers in the county to grow the same crop and did not anticipate oversupply.
According to China’s law on the Popularization of Agricultural Technology, any entity causing loss to farmers through the forced adoption of technology is required to repay total damages.
Siyit made his way to China’s State Council in Beijing last September to lobby on behalf of his fellow farmers. When he arrived, hundreds of other petitioners waiting to file their grievances were registering with the Council according to their home region.
In an attempt to draw Beijing's attention, Siyit shot a long video of the farmers telling their tale. A brief excerpt.
"There were eleven people from Xinjiang out of nearly 700 people in total. I was the only Uyghur there. I did not know what to do. I only speak a little Chinese. I was worried that they might take me somewhere and no one would know about it,” Siyit, a member of the mostly Muslim Uyghur ethnic group, said.
“A Chinese man came and asked why I was there. I tried to explain what had happened in our county, but the man said he could not understand what I was saying and took me to the Public Affairs Office of Xinjiang in Beijing so that he could talk to me through a Uyghur translator…After taking me there, they locked me up in a hotel room," he said.
Siyit said that he was not allowed to leave the hotel and was refused an explanation as to why he was being held.
Promised an investigation
Later, two Uyghurs from the Kashgar Public Affairs Office took him with them and installed him in a guard’s room with another man.
“They told me not to leave. I said ‘We are not animals and we have the right to file complaints and report problems.’ I told them that they could not just detain me, as I had come all the way [from Xinjiang] on behalf of my people,” Siyit said.
Eventually, police officers from Yengisar county came to take Siyit home.
“I took my bag and tried to escape, but they dragged me back and told me to return with them. They said that I had spent so much [money] to go to Beijing, and promised me that the prefecture-level government would investigate the problem,” he said.
Siyit told the police officers that he had spent nearly 2,000 Yuan (U.S. $290) during his 23 day journey to Beijing. He was told that all of his expenses would be paid if he would agree to return.
“They gave me 100 Yuan (U.S. $15) before I took the train. I asked them about the rest and they said it would be handled when we returned. But that never happened. That was the end of it," Siyit said.
‘They will weep’
Siyit claims that a compulsory “long bean” production plan was put into effect in 2007 for Yengisar county in Xinjiang’s western Kashgar prefecture, resulting in heavy financial losses for farmers when harvest supply grossly overshot demand.
Later that year the plan was repeated with similar results. In all, Siyit says, the farmers of Yengisar county suffered nearly $50 million Yuan (U.S. $7.3 million) in lost profit, loans that they could not repay, and equipment they could no longer use.
“You can dial any random number [in Yengisar] and ask about long beans…they will weep if you ask them about it,” Siyit said.
Siyit said that the 12 villages in Yengisar county have a combined population of 240,000 and that Yin should have expected that forcing everyone to grow the same crop would lead to oversupply.
“Being the secretary, he should have known that the supply would be much higher than the demand, and there would a lot of waste,” he said.
“If only the secretary had organized it so that one village would grow long beans, another would grow tomatoes, another peppers, and another eggplants…" he said.
Asked whether Li or the party branch of Kashgar prefecture was ultimately responsible for the failed crop policy, Siyit replied "Is it not true that what children do depends on the parents?"
Several attempts
Siyit said that he and several other farmers have been trying for over two years to file a complaint about the planning policies of Yin Xiaoliang, secretary of the communist party's Yengisar County Branch.
In those two years, he was detained by county authorities for 15 days in Yengisar and, after vowing to continue his fight, has since been bounced around to several departments at the county, prefectural, regional, and national level.
“There are few places left that I haven't been to for this. I went to the Xinjiang regional government in Urumqi five times. I went to Beijing once. To Kashgar, I made 13 or 14 trips in total,” Siyit said.
Siyit created a film documenting the reaction of the farmers to news that they would be forced to plant long beans again not long after the failure of the first crop plan, but officials weren’t interested.
"Over the last year and half, no one at the meetings of the disciplinary inspection committees was interested at looking at the video. Not even at the autonomous region’s government level. I literally had to thrust the video into their hands for them to take it," Siyit said.
“They did not investigate, only saying that such things happen. Around the time of Eid [the holiday marking the end of Muslim Ramadan] the police came and warned me, telling me to be quiet or I might become a victim,” he said.
“Even here, in our county, the traffic police detained me three or four times…I escaped towards Urumqi and that is the situation now.”
Official reaction
A government official with the Disciplinary Inspection Committee of Kashgar prefecture, who did not provide his name, said he was aware of the farmers’ petition.
“Originally we considered going to Yengisar country together with an agricultural business management group to investigate the case, but when we asked permission [from deputy secretary of the prefecture’s party committee Zhang Jian], he stopped us. We were told ‘You shouldn’t go, let the county leader investigate first,’” the official said.
When asked if it was correct procedure to have the county’s party secretary investigate a complaint brought against him, the official replied “I know it doesn’t sound right, but perhaps the prefectural officials have their own considerations…To manage a whole county is not that easy.”
“Of course [the prefectural officials] will protect him. The county and prefecture should have same viewpoint and the county will carry out the prefecture’s order. If the higher-level officials don’t protect the lower-level officials, how would they expect them to follow orders later on?” the official said.
No regrets
Siyit said that he plans to continue his fight, despite the hardships he has faced, so that he can bring justice to the farmers of Yengisar county.
“I have no regrets for what I have done. When I was at the police station, I told them that I would continue to seek compensation for the 50 million yuan loss as soon as I was free,” Siyit said.
“I just wanted to go [to Beijing] for the benefit of people, hoping to get a good answer. The fact that I did not know Chinese cost me a lot…It was as if I could not speak and I could only weep for my complaints,” he said.
Original reporting in Uyghur by Shohrat. Uyghur service director: Dolkun Kamberi. Written for the Web in English by Joshua Lipes.
Menbe:http://www.rfa.org/english/news/uyghur/longbean-farmer-01302009234055.html
Tuesday, February 3, 2009
Canada preferred destination for 6 Gitmo detainees
Detainees include 3 Chinese Muslims which the Middle Kingdom wants returned
By Janice Tibbetts, Canwest News ServiceFebruary 2, 2009 6:01 PM
OTTAWA - Six Guantanamo Bay detainees, backed by Canadian sponsors, are seeking refugee status in Canada with the pending closure of the U.S. detention centre in Cuba, including three Chinese Muslims who have been cleared of posing a threat to American security.
Human rights lawyers and other supporters have filed a formal application for Anvar (Ali) Hassan, an ethnic Uyghur who says he will be tortured or even executed if he is forced to return to China.
The 34-year-old prisoner, one of 17 Chinese Muslims sent to Guantanamo after being captured in Pakistan in 2002, is a “test case” of sorts in an international bid to find them safe homes, George Clarke, Hassan’s Washington-based lawyer, told Canwest News Service.
“We’re looking to find him a way out of Guantanamo and obviously Canada is on anybody’s short list,” Clarke told Canwest News Service.
“If they got comfortable in taking one or two guys, why wouldn’t they be comfortable in taking 17?”
Many other countries have been approached in the last couple of years to take the Guantanamo Uyghurs after they were cleared almost three years ago of being a terrorist threat to the U.S.
A judge ordered their release last September, but no country has been willing to offer them asylum.
China has unsuccessfully pressed the U.S. to return them to their homeland, saying that they are terrorists who are seeking an independent Muslim homeland in northwestern China.
Hassan, a dissident who fled China to live and train in a camp in Afghanistan in 2001, was among about two dozen Uyghurs who fled after the U.S. moved against the Taliban and were later caught in the hills of Pakistan.
The Chinese authorities have asserted that the Uyghur detainees were fighting with the Taliban forces in Afghanistan and Pakistan.
Hassan’s sponsor is the Don Valley Refugee Resettlement Organization, a group of eight churches in the Toronto area.
A summary of his case, supplied by his lawyers, says that he admitted to military training in Afghanistan, but that his motivation was “to fight to oppressive Chinese government.”
He says that he was tortured and beaten in prison in China in 1999, where he was held for one month for “being Uyghur.”
Mehmet Tohti of the Uyghur Canadian Society said that Canada came close to accepting Guantanamo Uyghurs in 2006, but backed off for fear of reprisal from China at a time when Canadian officials were trying to negotiate with authorities over the fate of Huseyin Celil, a Canadian citizen and ethnic Uyghur being held in China on terrorism charges.
Canada’s efforts failed and Celil was sentenced to life imprisonment in 2007.
Tohti said that bid to bring the detainees to Canada has been revived, in part, because there is a feeling that Canada has nothing to lose now that it has been snubbed by Beijing in the Celil appeal.
Tohti said Canada should “get the score equal” with China by ignoring the country’s international plea to reject the Guantanamo Uyghurs.
Moreover, permitting them to come to Canada would send a signal of Canada’s willingness to co-operate with the Obama administration, which is seeking countries to accept Guantanamo detainees in light of the planned closure, Tohti said.
Last October, the Anglican Diocese of Montreal sponsored a refugee application for Djamel Ameziane, an Algerian detained at Guantanamo since 2002. Like the Uyghurs, he has not been charged with anything.
Janet Dench, executive director of the Canadian Council for Refugees, said there has been no word from the Immigration Department on the fate of Ameziane, who lived in Montreal for five years during the 1990s.
Hassan’s bid to come to Canada is expected to be followed by five other attempts from Guantanamo detainees in the next few months, accompanied by sponsors who have come forward to support them, said Dench.
Three prospective refugees are Uyghurs, the others are from undisclosed countries, she said.
© Copyright (c) Canwest News Service
http://www.canada.com/news/Canada+pr...399/story.html
Detainees include 3 Chinese Muslims which the Middle Kingdom wants returned
By Janice Tibbetts, Canwest News ServiceFebruary 2, 2009 6:01 PM
OTTAWA - Six Guantanamo Bay detainees, backed by Canadian sponsors, are seeking refugee status in Canada with the pending closure of the U.S. detention centre in Cuba, including three Chinese Muslims who have been cleared of posing a threat to American security.
Human rights lawyers and other supporters have filed a formal application for Anvar (Ali) Hassan, an ethnic Uyghur who says he will be tortured or even executed if he is forced to return to China.
The 34-year-old prisoner, one of 17 Chinese Muslims sent to Guantanamo after being captured in Pakistan in 2002, is a “test case” of sorts in an international bid to find them safe homes, George Clarke, Hassan’s Washington-based lawyer, told Canwest News Service.
“We’re looking to find him a way out of Guantanamo and obviously Canada is on anybody’s short list,” Clarke told Canwest News Service.
“If they got comfortable in taking one or two guys, why wouldn’t they be comfortable in taking 17?”
Many other countries have been approached in the last couple of years to take the Guantanamo Uyghurs after they were cleared almost three years ago of being a terrorist threat to the U.S.
A judge ordered their release last September, but no country has been willing to offer them asylum.
China has unsuccessfully pressed the U.S. to return them to their homeland, saying that they are terrorists who are seeking an independent Muslim homeland in northwestern China.
Hassan, a dissident who fled China to live and train in a camp in Afghanistan in 2001, was among about two dozen Uyghurs who fled after the U.S. moved against the Taliban and were later caught in the hills of Pakistan.
The Chinese authorities have asserted that the Uyghur detainees were fighting with the Taliban forces in Afghanistan and Pakistan.
Hassan’s sponsor is the Don Valley Refugee Resettlement Organization, a group of eight churches in the Toronto area.
A summary of his case, supplied by his lawyers, says that he admitted to military training in Afghanistan, but that his motivation was “to fight to oppressive Chinese government.”
He says that he was tortured and beaten in prison in China in 1999, where he was held for one month for “being Uyghur.”
Mehmet Tohti of the Uyghur Canadian Society said that Canada came close to accepting Guantanamo Uyghurs in 2006, but backed off for fear of reprisal from China at a time when Canadian officials were trying to negotiate with authorities over the fate of Huseyin Celil, a Canadian citizen and ethnic Uyghur being held in China on terrorism charges.
Canada’s efforts failed and Celil was sentenced to life imprisonment in 2007.
Tohti said that bid to bring the detainees to Canada has been revived, in part, because there is a feeling that Canada has nothing to lose now that it has been snubbed by Beijing in the Celil appeal.
Tohti said Canada should “get the score equal” with China by ignoring the country’s international plea to reject the Guantanamo Uyghurs.
Moreover, permitting them to come to Canada would send a signal of Canada’s willingness to co-operate with the Obama administration, which is seeking countries to accept Guantanamo detainees in light of the planned closure, Tohti said.
Last October, the Anglican Diocese of Montreal sponsored a refugee application for Djamel Ameziane, an Algerian detained at Guantanamo since 2002. Like the Uyghurs, he has not been charged with anything.
Janet Dench, executive director of the Canadian Council for Refugees, said there has been no word from the Immigration Department on the fate of Ameziane, who lived in Montreal for five years during the 1990s.
Hassan’s bid to come to Canada is expected to be followed by five other attempts from Guantanamo detainees in the next few months, accompanied by sponsors who have come forward to support them, said Dench.
Three prospective refugees are Uyghurs, the others are from undisclosed countries, she said.
© Copyright (c) Canwest News Service
http://www.canada.com/news/Canada+pr...399/story.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
